Alrighty. This is not going to be one of our typical costume drama posts, so bear with me. As Frock Flicks’ resident semi-competent nerd culture “expert” (lots of qualifiers there), it falls to me to discuss the following new TV show.
Disney+ just released the first two episodes of the first installment of the ambitious Phase Four of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, WandaVision (2021-), and I’ve just binged both and can’t wait for more. Judging by the sets and costumes, each episode jumps ahead about 10 years in an alternate reality where Wanda Maximoff (Elizabeth Olsen), sans Sokovian accent (for reasons), is trapped by some unknown entity with her android boyfriend, Vision (Paul Bettany), as characters in a 1950s sitcom akin to The Dick Van Dyke Show, I Love Lucy, and in the second ep, something drawing heavily from Bewitched (no doubt a nod to Wanda’s superhero name, Scarlet Witch). Though the third episode won’t drop until next week, the preview shows at least two more time jumps in sitcom history, the 1970s and 1980s, which are past the cutoff date of 1969 for this website, so this post will really just deal with the ’50s and ’60s episodes for the costume content, but also just a lot of my speculation about where the show in general is going.
Surprising perhaps no one, I am a big fan of the MCU movies. I never followed the comics in any meaningful way, but they certainly did make up a substantial part of the larger cultural miasma that I grew up in. That said, from the moment I saw Iron Man (2008) on the big screen … well, you could just say I was on board. Truthfully, I’m actually not so much writing this post for the fans of the superhero genre, but for the fans of costume flicks, who may find themselves intrigued by a show that’s not so much recreating history, but rather television history, and then wind up accidentally thrown into the deep end of the MCU pool as things get less Mary Tyler Moore, and more … Twilight Zone-y with some pretty esoteric comics history dumped on them.
In other words, I fear that this show is, at best, going to confuse both fans of the historical film genre and fans of the Marvel comics genre, and, at worst, it’s going to piss both groups off.
Oh, and since there’s no spoilers in history, but there are in the rest of the world, here’s your spoiler alert: I’ll not only be discussing WandaVision, but also some of the backstory about what makes these two characters important, not just to one another, but the overall Marvel Cinematic Universe. If you haven’t watched any of the Marvel Avengers films, and are still hoping to remain unspoiled (after like, 10 years, or whatever), now’s your warning to go get caught up and come back later to read this review.
Alright? Alright. Carrying on.
I’m just going to say it upfront: Disney made some bold choices in kicking off with a television series that deals with two of the more secondary characters in the Avengers cinematic saga, Scarlet Witch and Vision, and to center them in a plot that is driving the female character in that duo hard into the abyss of her own fractured psyche. Wanda’s always had a bit of a hard time dealing with reality, which is no surprise considering her main super power is to bend it to the breaking point. She’s also had a rough go of it recently, having been more or less directly responsible for the death of her boyfriend, Vision, in Avengers: Infinity War (2018). The gut-wrenching scene where Wanda is forced to destroy the Mind Stone, which is unfortunately situated in Vision’s forehead and basically gives him life, just to keep it out of Thanos’ hands, is one of the best scenes of the entire Avengers movie arc. In my humble opinion.
If you didn’t know any of this, and you dropped into WandaVision, you’re going to be pretty confused. For those of us who do know it, it’s still confusing considering Vision is “dead” (or, at least destroyed, but who knows when you’re dealing with an android), and obviously it makes no sense that the undead Vision is hanging out in a black-and-white world with his living girlfriend, cracking jokes to a disembodied laugh track (though in reality, the first two episodes were filmed in front of a live audience, believe it or not).
Wanda and Vision also seem fairly self-aware of the improbable situation they’re in, but neither seems to be able to remember anything about their lives before they came to idyllic Westview, USA. In the first episode, when asked where they moved from and how long they’ve been married, neither can come up with an answer, and instead of quickly making something up on the spot, they both sort of just stall out, unable to so much as deflect the question to cover for the gap in their collective memory. How Wanda got there, with Vision no less, is clearly the big question driving the plot.
Some think this is a construct of Wanda’s grieving for Vision, an attempt to reset the pieces of her life in a picture-perfect 1950s sitcom fashion, where no problem can’t be overcome without a funny quip and a perfectly baked pot roast. I was also thinking along those lines after having watched the previews, but now I’m wondering if there isn’t something else at play, and Wanda may not be there (wherever there is) of her own volition. It’s that question of who is behind the veil watching Wanda play house with Vision that has me wrapped up in the cozy world of fan theories and possibilities.
All of this is to say that I am hopeful for WandaVision being an important turning point for the Marvel Cinematic Universe, for all of the reasons I listed above, but also because I really enjoy the “reality within unreality” that the show is playing with. Only time will tell if it will serve all of the expectations heaped on it as the pivot point in the MCU’s Phase Four, but so far, I think it will. And for aficionados of historical costume flicks, I think it will also provide a fun diversion into a bit of TV history.
Have you seen WandaVision? Share your thoughts (and spoilery fan theories) with us in the comments!
Haven’t watched this yet but the description reminds me of Jasper Fford’s Thursday Next book series.
I love Thursday Next!!
I love it. I am deep into the MCU, and am currently re-reading House of M on Kindle anyway, so…. I have seen tons of people say it’s boring or they don’t get it and that’s fine, it’s not going to be everyone’s cup of tea. That doesn’t make me stupid because I DO like it as someone I know told me. Just let people enjoy things, sheesh.
Have you heard the theory that “Vision” is actually Mephisto? That’s intriguing. I mostly hope Wanda is stark raving and we gets lots of drama, but I’m not sure that’s where it’s headed as apparently there will be some sort of invasion? Anyway, I’d down for it.
Damn. I don’t have Disney+ and actually don’t even have a way at present to GET Disney+ .
I’d have to get some sort of add-on like a Roku stick just to give me an app for it (my “smart TV” clearly has some gaps in its “education”), but this is almost enough to cause me to break down and get it.
EMMA CAULFIELD (Ford)!!!!!
I really appreciate the way you’ve managed to avoid anything that constitutes a spoiler, while giving a tantalizing look at the show. You’ve managed to not reveal much more than the sneak preview trailer and promotional materials for the show have put out.
BUNNIES!!!!!!!! (Man, I hope that goes where I’m hoping it’s going…)
And the period costumes/hairstyles are accurate and look great, especially on Elizabeth Olsen.
I find it kind of weird that this sort of story structure is confusing to some people, given the film PLEASANTVILLE and the short-lived TV series HI, HONEY, I’M HOME! that preceded it (and flipped the premise)– plus numerous individual “stuck in a TV show version of my life” episodes of shows like SUPERNATURAL.
I guess I could see people confused and pissed that Disney+ did a HUGE pre-release buildup of their tentpole MCU television series (“Better than the NETFLIX Marvel shows, because WE’VE got the REAL stars!”), then led the roll-out with something that’s seemingly such a weird digression.
Holy heck. I haven’t thought about “HI HONEY I’M HOME” in…forever. Wow. Thank you for that.
I have only seen the photo, but “BUNNIES!!!” was my exact reaction too. (Or maybemidgets?)
The Vision was one of my favorite MARVEL comics characters back in the 70’s and 80’s (before they ruined him); and I’ve just loved Paul Bettany’s live-action incarnation of the character. I could watch Bettany playing Vision all day and all night; and I can only hope they haven’t killed him off for good in the MCU.
So I’ve enjoyed WandaVision for Bettany’s role; Olsen’s acting, the mystery of why Vizh and Wanda are stuck in SitComLand. I could take or leave the sitcom elements; I never liked the 1960’s sitcoms, in particular the convention of main characters doing a mad scramble to prevent or fix an embarrassing situation. (Vision should never, ever, be confused with Darrin of “Bewitched”).
It’s great to see Emma Caulfield onscreen again!
I plan to see all the episodes, of course…
I’m in for it if I can find it. I saw most of the original sitcoms, so it should be fun. I’ve seen most of Marvel’s (and DC’s) output, so I have some idea what’s what.
I fangirled HARD over the episode 1 dresses. They wear bullet bras! The people behind the scenes know proper foundation garments are essential for a period look! (happy swoon)
Was also amused how I dated episode 2 just from Wanda’s hairstyle.
I would have loved to see the costumes from episode one in color – what collar was that darling cocktail dress? WHAT COLOR IS THAT FABULOUS PEIGNOR!?!?!?
Netflix released a (much too short) costume “behind the scenes” clip on YouTube that shows some filming shots. The house dress is mint green and I love it! I hope they release more of that.
Woohoo! I’m so excited you covered this show, but I was a little disappointed that you didn’t analyze the costumes more. Will that be happening in future posts?
I quite enjoyed it–I’m not well-versed in the backstory, being basically an MCU fan, but I am glad to be along for the ride. I quite liked the costumes so far–I imagine they won’t be as fun when they get closer to what I have memories of, but presumably we’ll know more about the plot then.
They put out a couple featurettes on the marvel YouTube channel including one on the costumes that show the costumes in color. They also briefly mention the need to design the color scheme of the costume around the fact that they were shooting in black and white (not enough for my taste but oh well).
I am.old, so I saw all these shows when they were new, not on Nick at Nite.
The Dick Van Dyke Show was early 60’s, not 50’s. But this show began with a reference to the opening scene in which Rob Petrie (Dick) either falls over the ottoman or nimbly avoids it. Perhaps because most of those sitcoms were throwaway fluff and the Van Dyke show was actually good.
In episode two, Wanda shows up in slacks. Which Laura Petrie (Mary Tyler Moore) famously rocked, breaking the spell of housewives in shirtwaists, heels and pearls.
When not watching TV, which was much more limited in those days, I was reading my brother’s comic books. DC was already showing its age, with Bizarro World my favorite bit. Marvel Comics were fresh and new. I left home and the later 60’s took me in a different direction. Fanboys on YouTube have filled me in on some of the weird evolution of later Marvel comics, in great detail.
I am a fan of the MCU films. And will gladly tune in to Wanda’s further adventures. Doled out week by week, just like the old days…..
Thank you! Dick Van Dyke show was 1969-1965. It overlapped with the first year of Bewitched. Laura was in Camelot era chic when not in slim trousers and flats with a Jackie Kennedy bob (which got less bouffant as time progressed). She was never Lucy/Donna Reed/June Cleaver. The show was influenced by Dick Van Dyke Show (to the point where the producers talked to DVD himself as a consultant) but episode 1 aka “In front of a live audience” is set in the 1950s.
1961-1965. I can’t edit my post. Argh.
Thanks for these posts! I am LOVING WandaVision and love that my favorite blog is talking costumes!