21 thoughts on “Top 10 Bustle Frock Flicks, Part 2

  1. I have a question about bustles. What did a lady do if she already had a “shelf-like” backside? Did she just add fabric and forgo the bustle? [I am blessed with such, so no Roaring 20s flapper looks for me.]

    1. For most of the bustle era, a woman would wear some kind of bustle foundation, which could range from a soft pad to a wired structure (& there were TONS of different designs & shapes!). The exact size of that foundation would vary according to the woman’s own proportions, taste, social status, & the fashion of the year. Take a look at those silhouettes at the very top of this post — no human woman could have a backside shaped like the early bustle or late bustle eras; that’s all created with a foundation garment :)

      Only for the ‘natural form’ fashion, about 1875-1882 ish (in the middle of the top image), were gowns very slim & fitted, & the ‘bustle’ look was just created with skirt draperies, so no foundation was worn underneath.

      1. ‘Natural Form’ strikes me as an amusing misnomer but I do prefer that silhouette to the extreme centaur like bustle of the mid eighties.

        1. Well, the style did show more of an hourglass body shape than had been previously shown in women’s fashion. Still an idealized form, but a bit more “natural” than the big bustles, hoops, exaggerated sleeves, & empire waists of the rest of the century ;)

  2. I could have sworn that in “Age of Innocence” May’s white evening gown was her wedding dress, altered. Maybe that detail was in the book? Why would I even think that?

    1. In the movie I think the narrator says that it was the custom in those circles for brides to wear their wedding dress to other events for the first year after the wedding. We do see May wearing her wedding dress at the theater or opera. I’m sure someone with a better memory can elaborate or correct me!

      1. In both the book and the film she rewears her wedding dress once, to the opera, where they leave early because archer has a headache.

        In the book she snags it on the carriage door, tearing it, with the mud in the street making it dirty. As this happens before Archer intends to confess to May about his affair with Ellen, this is symbolic of their broken marriage.
        I always found it to be a bit too on the nose of an analogy, so maybe thats why they left that bit out of the film, which follows the book quite literally most of the time.

      1. Oops! Spelled Winona wrong, so it didn’t come up on my search. Sorry ’bout that!

  3. “The Age” is definitely my fave here, although “Lillie” runs a close second. Happy memories of watching it with my best friend, now dead, and sighing over the frocks and Peter Egan as Wilde.

  4. Beautiful,feminine and ornate. I love all the dresses! I’m a elder goth too. It’s nice to be old enough to afford the things we wanted as teens lol thanks for sharing. I want to watch all of the frock flicks.

  5. Is the hairstyle on Michelle Pfeiffer historically accurate? It looks awful. But I don’t very much care for her.

    1. She has a couple hairstyles throughout the film & they’re pretty accurate IMO. Check out the full review for how they’re also important to the story.

      1. The one where she is wearing a dressing gown reminds me of an awful ’80s perm.

        I loved the book when I read it but that was 20 years ago. The costumes are beautiful.

  6. Is the dark green gown shown in “Daniel Deronda” the same one in “The Buccaneers?”

    1. I don’t think so — if you look really closely, the Buccaneers gown has an overskirt with a scalloped trim & the hem has a ruffle, but the Daniel Deronda gown doesn’t have an overskirt at all & the hem has pleats.

  7. Except for ‘Lillie’ these all seem to be ‘I’m so miserable but at least I look great!’ type movies.

Comments are closed.