Going back to watch your childhood favorite films is always fraught. Will they hold up under the cold, cynical eye of adulthood? What terrible prejudices lurk therein, waiting to be discovered with cringing horror when you what realize racism/sexism/homophobia was flying under the radar 20, 30, 40 years ago? I’m not going to lie, I was more than a little worried when I decided to re-watch Victor/Victoria (1982) for this post. It had been probably a good 20 years since I had last seen it, but it had been on heavy rotation throughout my childhood, so while I remembered it fondly, I also remembered how much I’ve remembered loving other films as a kid only to realize how many reprehensible themes they contained as an adult. And considering the plot of Victor/Victoria broaches not only the topics of homosexuality, transgenderism, and feminism, it also is a slapstick-y comedy, there was a part of me that was watching through my mental fingers, waiting for the moment when some awful statement about sexuality or gender identity would explode forth and ruin my childhood memories entirely.
I’m relieved to report that pretty much didn’t happen. There are some minor aspects to the film’s plot that, if it were made today, could probably be handled with a little more sensitivity, but otherwise, Victor/Victoria holds up. In fact, it more than holds up. It damn near is better than any other film out there at addressing the fluid dynamics of gender identity, gay, straight, cis, trans, and everyone in between. And it has one of the best on-screen couples ever, Julie Andrews and Robert Preston, whose chemistry is delightfully cozy as straight woman and gay man teaming up against the heteronormative world of the 1930s.
Victor/Victoria was based on the 1933 German film Viktor und Viktoria, which I haven’t seen, so I can’t make any specific comparisons between the two films and whether one is intrinsically better than the other. The screenplay was adapted by Julie Andrews’ husband, Blake Edwards, who also directed the film.
A cynical person might not buy the premise of Julie Andrews, unquestionably feminine as she is, playing a role of an androgynous male drag performer (or “a woman playing a man playing a woman” in the film’s own words), but Andrews’ portrayal of “Victor” is convincing when you take half a step back and look at it from the standpoint that Victor is a man because he says he is. There’s even an early scene between Victor and the excessively manly King Marchand (played by the excessively manly James Garner), where Marchand attempts to intimidate Victor into admitting that he is actually a woman in drag.
Victor: Your problem, Mr. Marchand, is that you’re preoccupied with stereotypes. I think it’s as simple as you’re one kind of man, I’m another.
King Marchand: And what kind are you?
Victor: One that doesn’t have to prove it. To myself, or anyone.
Of course they fall in love, and much of the time devoted to their love affair is focused on Marchand feeling like he has to keep whatever tenuous grip on his masculinity he can as he realizes the implications of living openly with Victor when Victoria tells him she doesn’t want to give up being Victor. This is really the only thing about the film that I didn’t super care for. But thankfully, the parts of the film dealing with Marchand and his fragile hetero-masculine identity are brief and filmed with a gently mocking side-eye to the audience that acknowledges Marchand’s rigidity is what is truly abnormal. That said, he does try.
So let’s talk costumes, which were designed by Patricia Norris (Twelve Years a Slave, The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford). They show a good range of styles for the early 1930s, from day to evening-wear, with a couple of notable stand outs:
To sum up, you should definitely give this film a watch, if you haven’t already seen it 943 times (and let’s face it, I know our audience likely has seen it at least that many times). Hell, you should watch it a 944th time, it’s that worth it. And on that note, I just want to say…
I think the film holds up, maybe has come of age in this era. All the cast did a sterling job. Garner can play pretty much anything, partly because he takes the work more seriously than he does himself. Andrews probably found her role a relief after some of the more sugary roles she’d had.
“Better love story than Twilight.” That’s not saying very much, lol. :)
Thank you thank you thank you for reviewing this! It’s one of my favorites, and it DOES hold up beautifully. The Deco era is gorgeously represented, and Julie’s voice when she was in her prime – miraculous.
One of my all-time favourites <3 I’m planning to recreate the Le Jazz Hot costume this year.
I think the big coat in the exhibit is the one she takes off right at the beginning of the number.
One of the things I love about that costume is the layers. The final glittering fringe dress underneath is absolutely a knockout and shows off Julie’s legs so beautifully. Side note, I love how they went full Jean Harlow with the character of Norma…only without the class.
I did the Le Jazz Hot ensemble and performed it as a drag number.
In fact, I was privileged to perform it as part of the half-time entertainment at the Historical masquerade at Costume-Con 23 in Ogen, Utah!
The marabou-edged coat appears at the very beginning (slow intro) part of the performance in the film.
One challenge in building the ensemble for live performance is that it had to actually be built in layers that could be shed: the fringed leotard, a sleeveless sheath over that with a trimmed skirt, and then the wrapped coat over that.
I suspect the costume transitions in the film may have actually had two dresses — the fringed leotard, and then the sheath-over-leotard as an actual garment rather than layers.
And I loved your Le Jazz Hot! A fantastic tribute.
I have a recording of it, but haven’t put it on Youtube because I wasn’t sure what the soundtrack licensing would do to it. Maybe just add ads.
I was wondering if you would comment! I remember seeing the photos from that performance. And thanks for the clarification about the robe. I couldn’t place it when I found the photo, so it was a complete mystery as to where it was in the film, without re-watching the whole thing again.
Oh! I did post it to my channel after all!
Ah… I had uploaded it buy never listed it. I can share a link if you like.
Eep! mashes play
Waiting to hear if you liked it. (Curse the videographer who skipped rehearsals and failed to set the white balance!)
Yeah, I was trying to mentally track how they did the Le Jazz Hot costume, because the camera cuts away as she climbs the stairs, and the next cut she’s in the full-fringe outfit. My brain parsed it as a fringed and sequined under dress and a black sleeveless kind of belted peignoir over it, which she ditches at the top of the stairs. Wouldn’t surprise me if it was 3 separate layers, though.
I did it as a modified unlined cocoon coat for the opening (silver “liquid metal” knit wrong-side-out), over a sleevless shift with a big skirt, fastened at the waist, over the fringed, sequined, and stoned leotard.
Nude fishnets over nude stockings to make the legs pop visually on stage.
ANd here’s a clip of just the performance from the film.
Wish I could have afforded a chorus line for my production ;-)
I still suspect there were two versions, one with the overlayer stitched in place, and one without, of the fringed leotard.
Wish you had included the entire Robert Preston performance of “Shady Dame.”
Ta da! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EV6-Fgfc7Lk
If you want to watch Viktor und Viktoria, which has its own, different charms, you can rent it from Kino Lorber and watch on the Kino Now app.
“Oh, god… there’s nothing more inconvenient than an old queen with a head cold.”
I simply love this movie from King Marchand’s gay bodyguard to Victoria growing up with tons of brothers to the double entendre of ‘Gay Paris. Wish that Julie and Robert did more films together. And this was a reunion of sorts as Julie and James made Americanisation of Emily.
Great content! Keep up the good work!
I share the love for this movie. My only reservation is how crassly annoying Warren’s character is allowed to be. If her performance were a (dumb) person instead of a cartoon, the film would gain nuance. And, Victor’s triumph would be the greater.
LOVE THIS MOVIE from the first time I saw it at the movies. I wore out my VHS version of it and now I have a DVD it is in regular rotation. The music by Mancini is so extra. I love Crazy World. I love it all. Gorgeous costumes.
As Peter Cook says in Bedazzled, “Say the magic word: Julie Andrews.” :)