7 thoughts on “TBT: A Passage to India (1984)

  1. I loved this adaptation and found it haunting in how it dealt with cross cultural romance and a woman’s lack of sexual awareness during that time period.

  2. I wish Merchant Ivory made it. I prefer the book, but the costumes are lovely and the photography gorgy. And it introduced me to Judy Davis.
    So on the whole, not bad.

  3. I had to read the book and watch the movie for College. I was unimpressed with the movie. while it was visually stunning, the story left me flat. Even the book was meh in my opinion. I actually wanted to smack Miss Questad, hard!

  4. Let me begin with the frocks. Because Adela was supposed to be so plain, her costumes were supposed to reflect her lack of allure, so there is nothing memorable there. I must say that in terms of eye catching factors I was drawn more to the landscape and Nigel Havers. At athe time I thought him the most beautiful man on earth, even when he played a dick like in APTI.
    Thanks for pointing out there are no important female Indian characters in APTI. Now that I think about it, there were no important Indian women in The Raj Quartet, only secondary characters like Lily Chatterjee or Kumar’s aunt. Amazing, I must go back to John Masters novels to think of something like a Hindu heroine.
    APTI is not an exponent of racism in the British Raj, not like The Jewel in the Crown or another great but forgotten novel that has never made it to TV, Louis Bromfield’s The Rains Came. To me the most depressing aspect of the wallah’s prejudices is not Miss Quested’s ridiculous accusation or the way the Brits gang around her, but the destruction of the Fielding -Assiz bromance, and how relieved I was at the end when they were back at it together.
    In college, I was told Foster was much more into Eastern religions than in the Anglo-Hindu relationships, that Mrs. Moore was uncomfortable with Indians and English alike, because she was dying and she found much more comfort within herself than in human company.

    1. I never read the Raj Quartet, the source for the TV series The Jewel in the Crown, but the series I saw was very critical of British racial and social attitudes towards Indian society. A lot of the plot hinges on such a critique. I don’t see the series as an exponent of racism in the British Raj,

      1. Sorry, if I didn’t make myself clear. I meant the description of racial prejudices in the Anglo community towards the Hindu community in the days of the British Raj. I never implied that Paul Scott, or the series, were biased against the Indians. On the contrary, both are very critical of English bigotry in that period and milieu
        On the other hand, nowadays we perceive the casting of white actors in ethnic roles, o the absence of ethnic characters playing significant part in a story or even having less female ethnic characters within the said story as non-PC or plain racist. As Trystan pointed out the only Hindu females in APTI are a bunch of anonymous giggling ladies in saris that are invited to tea for Mrs. Moore’s benefit. She made me realize then that there were not important female Hindu characters in The Raj Quartet, Lily Chatterjee being an exception and she only appears in the first book.

  5. I read the book a few years ago and was surprised at how underwhelmed I was — I loved Howards End and A Room with a View, and I really expected to love APTI.

    And I had completely forgotten that Alec Guinness was in brownface for this movie — in 1984! Seriously?? I think Amy Irving played an Indian in The Far Pavilions, because, clearly, there were no Indian actresses available. Hmpf.

Comments are closed.