20 thoughts on “MCM: Eddie Redmayne

  1. My fav is a tie between The Danish Girl and Pillars with My Week With Marilyn and Theory of Everything a close second.
    I intensely dislike Philippa Gregory novels, but he was a credible Stafford.

    1. Your list looks a lot like my list! I’m going to cover “My Week With Marilyn” and “Theory of Everything” at some point. Both get the late-50s-early-60s spot-on.

      1. And of course Marilyn’s wardrobe. BTW wasn’t she a fan of Charles James’ fashions?

        And now to something completely funny, a review of movies/TV where Sean Bean survives?

  2. I didn’t think anyone could make me like Marius, whom I normally find unbearably irritating, but Eddie Redmayne did it! He made me believe in his passion for the Cause (which gave him more dimension than Young Fool In Love), and played the young idealist convincingly enough that I could forgive the whole “love at first sight” thing. No small feat!

    1. I could write an entire novel about how much the Marius-Éponine-Cosette thing pisses me off, SO MUCH. SO SO SO MUCH. I agree that the musical doesn’t really give either Marius or Cosette much to work with, but Éponine just blows everyone out of the water every time she’s in a scene. She’s given the best songs and the best lines and the best character development and Marius can’t be bothered to give a shit until she’s literally dying in his arms. I’m sorry, who wouldn’t fall in love with this passionate, charismatic young woman who is willing to lay down her life for a cause she believes in? And Marius is all “Oh, hey, I think I loved you a little bit, too! But you’re dead now, so I’mma just gonna after that one-dimensional walking ‘helpless female’ stereotype now that you’re conveniently out of the picture and except for a tiny footnote at the end of the musical where I tell your parents off for being assholes to you, I’m not going to spend any time examining my own dumbassery.”

      I know it’s different in the book, but face it, the musical is where it’s at.

      Ok, so that might have explained a lot about my high school love life, except for the part about getting shot and dying and all. But still!

      1. Hi I like reading your blog but this comment really annoyed me, it’s like the reverse of the entitled “nice guy” argument. “Eponine’s such a nice girl, Marius is a dumbass for not being with her”. He didn’t love her romantically (not even a little bit, it’s possible to love someone as a friend), that doesn’t make him an dumbass.

        1. She didn’t say Eponine was nice, she said Eponine was far more complex of a character than bland boring Cosette! Which is so right. What I hate is that Marius is clearly humoring Eponine while she dies.

          1. My point was it mirrors the arguments a lot of entitled “friendzoned” guys make, but with the genders flipped. I know Eponine wasn’t literally called nice. And what do you want Marius to do shove her away from him and leave her to die alone?

            Sarah – Yes it’s fictional but the ideas behind it aren’t – by your logic nothing fictional can ever be offensive. Plus you literally said it was your own high school experience. Someone isn’t a jerk for having the audacity to not be into you…

    1. I think Lea reacted this way because she thought Eponine’s love was being justified through her willingness to die for him, which I have to admit I could have construed from your comment at first. I’m not really a Les Miserables fan–I’ve read the book once, many years ago, in translation, AND I think it was an abridged version–and I’ve never seen the musical. But from what I seem to remember Eponine did come across as somewhat obsessive and stalkerish in the book. And obviously, any argument that goes “I’m entitled to you because I love you so much (that I will do this and that for you)” should be answered with “Wtf? Well that’s your problem if you do!” Also, to be willing to sacrifice your life for a man who doesn’t give a shit about you–how much more doormat-ish can you get? To me Eponine seemed as bad as –if not worse than– Cosette in her own way from a modern feminist point of view. But, in response to Lea, I think here the comment was meant to point out that (in the musical at least) Eponine was a far more complex character and stronger woman than Cosette, in which case I’d be frustrated too see her completely passed over by the young hero in favour of the bland, docile and pretty “heroine”.

      1. Eponine was a far more complex character and stronger woman than Cosette, in which case I’d be frustrated too see her completely passed over by the young hero in favour of the bland, docile and pretty “heroine”.

        I don’t want to get into beating a dead social justice horse but yes, you understand what my hyperbole-laden rant was getting at.

        And yes, Eponine in the book was a horrible, stalkery character who didn’t so much love Marius, but was obsessed with him. She was majorly remade into a strong female lead in the musical, Marius’ best friend even, with a full set of teeth and everything. So the narrative changes from “stalker” to “girl who is one of the guys” which I, as a teenager, very much identified with. So in my admittedly narrow view of the world at age 15, this appealed to my experience as being the nerdy girl that got to listen to the guy she had a crush on go on for hours about some more popular girl he admired. I mean, hell, this is the premise of at least a dozen teen films and god knows how many books, that I was raised with and identified with.

        So. My ranting was not to say that Eponine had more right than Cosette to be Marius’ object of desire. It was to say, “Taken at face value, because this is a derivative work of fiction, Les Miz Eponine is given more depth than any of the other characters, aside from Valjean, so it comes across as contrived when Marius falls for the 2-D female lead at, literally, first glance.” A 2-D female lead, by the way, that is basically given everything simply because she is “good” (rough start in life notwithstanding) and conforms to all the gender and social stereotypes of what a “good girl” should be, how she should act, and even how she looks (blonde, pretty, traditionally feminine). Les Miz Eponine, on the other hand, is fundamentally “good” at heart, despite her despicable parents, but she is non-gender conforming (dresses as a boy, hangs out with the boys, does not act like a “good girl”) and she is willing to lay down her life for a cause (not for Marius — big difference between the book and the musical). So much time is spent working to build Les Miz Eponine’s character and then she dies. In the book, she leaps in front of the musketfire and dies protecting Marius, which I guess is considered a character flaw these days. In the musical, she is mistaken for a man and is shot returning to the barricade to warn her brother and Marius about some plot or something.

        Either that, or I’m just an entitled shitlord at heart.

  3. I’ve seen all of them except the last two. I blame it on my need to watch every available costume drama in existence.

    Eddie is one of those actors that I forgot to notice for awhile, and then in hindsight realized — YOU ARE IN EVERYTHING. He’s very good. I’ll be interested to see “The Danish Girl” one of these days.

    1. That’s exactly how it happened for me. I remember hearing his name a lot over the last year (probably since his Oscar win last year) and I finally got curious when I noticed he was in “Pillars of the Earth”, looked him up on IMDB, and realized he’s been in EVERYTHING.

      And definitely watch “The Danish Girl”. It’s gorgeous. One of the most beautifully filmed movies I’ve seen in ages. Bummed it didn’t get any love from the Academy.

  4. Team Eponine here!! I lost a lot of respect for Marius for “falling” for such a ridiculous ideal of a girl. Wonder if he would have fallen so hard if he knew what her mom did for a living… ;)

    And yes! Watch Danish Girl! I had been avoiding it (not my favorite time period, plus I wasnt sure how interesting tje story would be since I already knew the punchline), but It was really compelling. I especially loved the focus on how his wife handled everything… It was really thought provoking!

  5. I really don’t understand this man’s appeal. He is a moderately good actor, but I’ve yet to be bowled over by a performance of his. He is also rather ugly and owes much of his success to the fact that he was born wealthy.

Comments are closed.